INDEX // mb Ideas on Publishing Books in Canada (and other attempts to write good)

Future of Tech Books: Sizzle and Steak

I have a pet theory that tech publishing is going to become a personality driven part of the book business the same way cookbook publishing has. Microwave ovens and online recipe databases should have killed off the cookbook long ago. It has survived. Reading about boiling an egg is about as exciting as Windows Vista in 25 Minutes a Day. There is still a place for that, but bring on the blockbusters and the celebrities. Being a foodie isn’t that different than being a techie, so why can’t we sell it to the mainstream as a lifestyle?

Sadly I can’t convince my friends that this is likely or possible. They find the whole notion of tech celebrity distasteful — something about the hacker ethos. And apparently a ‘timeless tech book’ is a contradiction in terms.

I admit I have no supporting evidence for my position.

Perhaps that’s why I was emboldened by tech author Charles Petzold’s blog entry from a year ago last month. He talks about the value of an author finding a logical through line for a topic by writing about it in book form. He talks about writing tech books that last.

It turns out, I was getting my hopes up. Like me, Amy Hoy caught up with Petzold’s post a year later. In her words she “neatly eviscerated this aggravatingly fact-free essay” in her post at Slash7. Here is a sample of her tone:

I don’t know about you, dear reader, but since Mr Petzold is being all colloquial, I think I will be, too. I’ve read a lot of programming books. I’ve tried to learn programming of various types from several, back before I could program very well in anything at all. I found every last one to be too boring, dry, ridiculously narrow-sighted, and not providing the grand overview and synthesis that a book can provide but a free web tutorial does not. They typically feature numerous holes, conceptual leaps without warning, mistakes, bugs, and omissions that make the Internet, and the helpful people on it, a necessary companion to start with… and if the companion is free, why not just bypass the thing causing you the pain to begin with?

Hoy points out that quality writing on timely, in-demand topics still sells — just maybe not in book form. Publishers need to go where their readers are. Hoy says publishers and writers need to accept that fact and move on, “Left brain books — and books for experienced programmers — are out.”

I actually don’t think Petzold and Hoy are that far apart. Both want tech writing to be vibrant and valuable. Hoy just wants Petzold to stop complaining so much. Hear hear to reinventing the tech book business. I am all for faster, better, and sometimes cheaper. And I am willing to concede that we don’t have to invent the Gordon-Ramsay of tech to get there, although that reality show would still be fun.


2 Comments

Hi there. I think you’re spot-on with the foodie / techie analogy. May I steal it? :)

The only difference is, I think tech writing has been about celebrity for a while now. It’s just that nobody told the rest of the writers. When I was 12 years old, I had a professional crush on David Pogue and began to formulate my plans to be just like him when I grew up. That was nearly 13 years ago and while the majority of the authors in, say, Mac User magazine were anonymous and are now forgoten, David Pogue’s still famous. So is Andy Inhatko. And Robert X Cringely. And, um, Bruce Sterling. And Kevin Kelly. I could keep going. The thing they all have in common, other than perfect front-cover names, is that their writing oozes personality.

I don’t have official numbers but I’d bet money that the two best-selling tech series are Head First (created by celeb Kathy Sierra) and Missing Manual (created by celeb David Pogue). These two got their fame through writing, and they deserve it. They shaped their series’ strongly and that’s why they do so well. O’Reilly – the man and the publisher – also has a level of celeb status, although it seems their quality in general is waning.

I hope you really don’t think I’m like Charles Petzold. I’ve read one of his books and it was terribly written, meandery, and with inappropriate subject matter for the topic at hand. Also, I am pro-competition. I figure, if I’m failing at something, to look to myself for fault rather than blaming the market. I agree with him – and you – about the long-form narrative, but I disagree with the idea that he’s providing it.

( FWIW, when I say “books…are out,” I mean dead tree editions. Pragmatic Programmers and Peepcode, two very different ventures, are making an absolute killing providing the kind of content you just can’t find in blog posts. They rely purely on the quality of their content rather than a monopoly offered by the delivery mechanism. What’s wrong with a professionally packaged ebook, or a well-produced screencast? They are in many ways more suited to the topic of tech.)

Cheers,

Amy

Posted by Amy on 27 November 2008 @ 3pm

Hey Amy,

Thanks so much for your time.

I haven’t read any Charles Petzold so I didn’t want to speak directly to his output — although I am curious about his latest book on Turing. For now I will back away from the above comparison. Call it a conceit. Forgive me if you took offense.

I am big fans of Sterling and Kelly and to a certain extent O’Reilly, but [head slap] I hadn’t considered their output to be exhibit A in my floundering argument — and yes it is yours to steal. Thanks for that.

I am also a fan of Andy Inhatko but mostly from his appearances on MBW. On the most recent show he chuckled about having delivered his final pages for ‘iPhone Fully Loaded’ a mere five weeks ago and discovering upon its publication that it is already out of date. That proves your point right there — a new model is needed. Or to be more precise, a shift in perspective needs to skew towards existing, but newer models.

I hope people like yourself can lead that charge and prosper doing it.

Again thanks for your comment.
mark

Posted by mb on 27 November 2008 @ 4pm

Leave a Comment