INDEX // mb Ideas on Publishing Books in Canada (and other attempts to write good)

New Digital Initiative: Indigo Takes Wheel, Tries to Reinvent?

A couple of years ago Saturday Night magazine asked several architects to reimagine the master plan for Canada’s capital — Ottawa. They asked an American architect for suggestions. He proposed a modest change to the modest boulevard that runs perpendicular to the nation’s parliament. After all Canada is a modest power. Why misrepresent ourselves with a grandiose mall? Why go big, when small will do?

After reading first news of Indigo Books’ plans for a new e-content platform, as vague as it is, I am tempted to play a similar role to the American architect. I am tempted to suggest Indigo go small and simple, in spite of their ambition to go big. Usually I am all about innovation, but in this case I think Indigo should simply sell (e)books not try to shift the entire ebook/mobile marketplace. That is too much.

Let me backup for a second.

I want ebooks. I want ebooks on my iPhone. I want ebooks on my computer. I want them to be cheap(er). I want them to be future proof. And I want to buy them from Indigo.

I want to buy them from Indigo now.

To make me happy, all Indigo needs to do is set up a digital warehouse of DRM-free ePub/audio files and sell them to me. I would love that. I would buy heaps from them. Done right the addition of ebooks to  Indigo’s pre-existing product pages would be to the Kindle marketplace what Amazon’s MP3 store is to iTunes. A killer.

POW! Right back at you Bezos!

The ePub standard is set. It is device agnostic as well as platform agnostic. The standard has been shaky these past two years but it is a standard.

DRM is done. Indigo could use its clout to convince publishers to come around.

The most nuanced decision to make is whether to offer ‘a shelf in the cloud’ for customers with low-storage handhelds or not. Other than that, it is as simple as signing the terms and building the data warehouse. No? :)

By the sounds of it Michael Serbinis, Indigo’s chief technical officer, has other ideas. The Quill story says that he wants to create ‘an application’ for delivering publisher and user-submitted short content. I have something on my iPhone that does that already — it is called the internet. Forgive my pithiness Michael. I mean no disrespect but speaking as your target customer, I don’t want another layer — like this, this, this or even this — between me and an ePub file. I appreciate that you are trying to build value, but please, I beg you sell me a product not an ecosystem. That is my plea.

The one other thing in the article that had me worried was the focus on short content. Does anyone remember the Wired cover story on snack culture? See rebuttal here. It doesn’t work with books for two reasons: 1) Sampling a chapter mid-volume has to be the most unsatisfying reading experience of all time. Try it, you will see. Content chunking needs editorial intervention. End of story. 2) The filter problem just gets bigger as the content chunks get smaller. You can read the book excerpts in the newspaper because an editor already has. They are preselected for you. How should I know what chapter of War and Peace is the best to read out of sequence? How should I know what magazine article from Rolling Stone has stood the test of time? I don’t and I can’t.

Yes there are subway novels and twitter novels. But at the end of the day those are simply just novels too.

That said, I am fully prepared to be blown away in January. I would love if Indigo could change the way I consume content. As an iPhone and a Blackberry owner I am ready. And I am willing to pay. I hope they can go from standing start to success in no time. I hope they bring some innovation to the filter problem. But I still want a regular modest ebook store. Sell me ePub ebooks. I will be happy with that. No major architectural changes required.


7 Comments

I agree with you on the DRM and platform-agnostic availability. I do not want to be tied to a single retailer to buy my books. And I do not want to have to repurchase product if I lose my Sony Reader, or want to read on my iPhone at the same time.

Where I will disagree ever so slightly is the “chunking.” You are right in that novels are terrible for reading in bits — I have to do that for work all the time and it is infuriating and dissatisfying, even though the excerpts have been chosen by the book’s editor. However, I would like the ability to purchase single short stories from a collection, a knitting pattern from a book, a few recipes from another book, a particular chapter from a “for Dummies” book (when the rest is stuff I already know or don’t yet need). I would expect that the retail cost for these “chunks” would be higher than the percentage of content. So for instance, if a book contained 30 knitting patterns and retailed for $30, I would expect to pay $3-$5 per pattern, for instance. There is a break even point where it becomes cheaper to buy the entire book, which would be the ultimate goal. Still, if I only wanted one pattern, I would be unlikely to shell out the $30 for the whole book. In this way, the author would get something, rather than nothing.

Posted by Ann Kingman on 5 November 2008 @ 8pm

Ann, I groaned when I read your comment. Of course (head smack) single short stories, knitting patterns, and recipes are great candidates for chunking.

But I am a little more wary of the Dummies example. When I wrote the post I was thinking of the reading experience when you break up a health or parenting book. Like with Dummies, each chapter is designed to be self contained. In theory that sounds fine but in my experience reading a self contained chapter from a Dummies book is really frustrating. Just as a paragraph is not representative of a chapter, a chapter (in my mind) is not representative of a book.

The heft of a “complete” work — regardless of length — is what I want. Breaking books up is the reverse of reading a journalist’s collected work in book form. Or a blog turned into a book. Something is equally missing. When you read a piece meant to stand on its own you get density. When you read an extricated short piece you get a weak opening and a weak close. To me there seems to be less there.

That is totally a personal opinion. And if Indigo can create a marketplace of short content — for short content’s sake — I would be thrilled. But the idea that a book chapter on asthma is better than a magazine article on asthma is only valid in the cases of encyclopedic reference works. A writer wouldn’t approach a chapter and an article the same, why should readers?

My “end of story” line above wasn’t very well thought out. Thanks for calling me on it. :)

Posted by mb on 5 November 2008 @ 9pm

Great post and I agree, agree, agree! You are spot on. And I understand Ann’s comment and your response. My best chunking experience has been with travel guides. Love mix & pick from Lonely Planet and other travel publishers, and I love that I can put them on my phone. Easier to carry than the guidebooks.

Posted by Monique on 6 November 2008 @ 10am

[...] just wants them to give us the darned (e)books (huzzah!): I want ebooks. I want ebooks on my iPhone. I want ebooks on my computer. I want them to [...]

Posted by Indigo’s Complicated ebook Plans on 10 November 2008 @ 12pm

I couldn’t agree more, and I built an ePub platform. (I think of it as a way to centrally-store ePubs for later download onto whatever you want, with online reading and searching merely facilitators of that end.)

Posted by Liza Daly on 10 November 2008 @ 1pm

[...] Related: [...]

Posted by More Hints Re: Indigo/Chapters Content Chunking Initiative | INDEX // mb on 28 December 2008 @ 6pm

[...] have written extensively about this initiative (1,2,3) already. A couple first [...]

Posted by Indigo’s eReading Initiative — Shortcovers — is Out in The Open | INDEX // mb on 8 January 2009 @ 4pm

Leave a Comment